|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.238.190.31
In Reply to: Polanski's Oliver Twist posted by dave c on June 21, 2006 at 14:31:39:
According to the "Making Of" documentary that came with my rental copy, the scenery was all newly-built (and not painted backdrops). Only in one instance--the long shot down the main street--was a "blue screen" placed at the end of the street, allowing for additional architecture not in the budget. The rest of the buildings and locales were real and pretty believable, I thought.The problem I had with the Oliver was not his accent, but his rather flat emotional demeanor. He seemed fairly "inert" througout most of the movie. A comparison with the Oliver from the classic David Lean production of 1948 will demonstrate this kid's shortcomings.
As for Ben Kingsley's Fagin, I didn't find it all that bad, certainly not on the level of a "pantomime".
All in all, an enjoyable rendition of this classic, but I really want to see the David Lean version again (currently not available on DVD?).
Follow Ups:
Does that mean the view of St. Paul's in the background is in some way real?
Given the nearground is not in LOndon it seems unlikely...
I did not mean KIngsley was bad as Fagin... within the form of the film he was good, but it was not a film that seemed to aim for "real" in my opinion.
Yes, it would be good to compare the Lean version, especially the late scenes where Bill Sykes is cornered. I seem to remember some of the shots as being more or less identical.
Oliver himself seems somewhat flat.
I actually thought it could be to allow young viewers to identify more easily with him.
The image of St Paul's that you see in the distance is being projected (or however they do it) on the blue/green screen. Everything else in front of it is a real set that was built on the studio lot.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: