|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
162.119.232.102
I'm usually pretty forgiving of big-budget, Hollywood, no-brainer, "entertainment" movies like the first "Pirates.." but the sequel is much worse than I was expecting, and I was not expecting much at all.Problem List:
1. Boring. REAL boring, from start to finish.
2. Ridiculous, pointless, non-sensical excuse for a plot.
3. ZERO charisma and ZERO chemistry regarding all actors/actresses.
4. Long. WAY too long. There's enough material here for perhaps a
1-minute late-night extended commercial, like those fancy BMW
commercials.
Follow Ups:
.
I guess expanding Cap'n Jack from a character to a lead was not sustainable.
He probably had to dial back the "stoner" side of the Jack Sparrow character in order to make the sea captain role a little more believeable (to carry the central theme of the story), but it still works. If he had overdramatized the Jack Sparrow character in Dead Man's Chest like he did the first one the character might have become too predictable and cartoony. In this film he seemed a bit more "together" and focused, not quite as much at the mercy of precious coincidence. After all, this second effort was carefully orchestrated as a set-up for the 3rd film in the series in which all the stops should be pulled out.
...Johnny Depp is a big attraction - especially playing Keith Richards - even in a bad movie.Especially when there aren't much better movies to cempete with it...
Just about everything nowadays is funded by teenagers. I went to pick up our nieces and nephew from a movie a while back and took notice of the fact that about 80% of all attendees at the multiplex were teenagers. If you market a movie for teenagers IMO you'll do better than any other age group. I know my wife and I rarely (once every 3-4 years) go to the movies (only rentals for us). Our same age (30's and above) friends and relatives, basically the same. Our nephews, nieces and their friends; all the time.
This movie has teenage attendance/rentals all over it. All the kids I know have seen it (at least once) and will again when it rents. Me, I think I'll pass.
That's my take on it. I'll agree that it lacked the zest & cleverness of the first film, but while the charisma between the actors wasn't as strong this time around my wife and I didn't find this film boring. There were places that I felt PoTC: Dead Man's Chest went a little too far over the top to work it's magic. Note: When one's suspension of disbelief fails to kick-in then it becomes more of an exercise in appreciating the FX eye-candy.Still, overall I'd give it a 2 1/2 to 3 star rating on a 5 star scale; enough that we'll be buying the DVD when it comes out. The movie was fun, the characters likeable and the lush tropical settings interesting enough to merit another look, IMHO.
Oh, BTW, the 3rd installment will have "Keef" (Keith Richards), who inspired Johnny Depp's take on the character, portraying Jack Sparrow's father; that should be worth the price of admission all by itself! :o)
.
nt
Haven't we already established that this is a bad idea?
and a little more hype thrown in for good measure. Don't forget the Happy Meal tie-in, either.
But many a hyped movie fails at the box office. I didn't care for this one at all but I did like the first. This one was everything I expected in a bad sequel. I really can't explain it's success. Maybe people liked the first one soooo much that many of them were ready to enjoy anything with these same characters aboard. It's a tough one to explain. I suppose one could just say dumb audiences unite.
I was just being snarky. I haven't actually seen the film, so I can't comment on its relative suckiness. But, I know that the month leading up to its release, I was constantly bombarded by hype and tie-ins to the point where I couldn't go anywhere without seeing a reference to pirates in general.Not many films get that much media hype & "synergy"---it has to count for something, no matter how bad it is.
This sucker is doing AMAZING BO. I'm sure the hype you cite was important. I just think there had to be more behind it's success than just hype. It is frustrating because I geniunely don't see what it was.
There seems to be no shortage of it ;)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: