Films/DVD Asylum

Subject or film=trash? I thought it about as good as the average

4.235.200.212

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

tinear

(A)

In Reply to: "Monster" why did I waste all that time? posted by Victor Khomenko on August 15, 2006 at 09:59:59:

film, elevated somewhat by the performance.
Of course, that being said, it obviously is "easy" for a talented actor to portray a character with huge character components.
Much harder is the nuanced performance.

Follow Ups:

Re: Subject or film=trash? I thought it about as good as the average - Victor Khomenko 10:31:30 08/15/06 (1)
You are right - the character is so far off that acting calls for no subtlety. But the most depressing part of the movie is that nothing happens in those 90 or 100 minutes, it is utterly repetitious with hardly any hook or point of interest. Meaning, of course, rather pedestrian directing, quite of the "Based on True Story Made for Lifetime TV" standard.
But hey, it was free!
- Check out "Distant:" it'll cost, however! nt - tinear 14:33:19 08/15/06 (0)
  a

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Sonic Craft

You can not post to an archived thread.