|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.106.200.138
In Reply to: Duvall was shot from below a lot to make him appear larger than life. This posted by tinear on October 11, 2006 at 18:24:41:
Insane! He's being depicted as the epitome of a certain type of crazy person drawn to war. It's a demonstration (as are many things in the film) of the utter lunacy of the whole thing. I really thought that was obvious.And I don't have much feeling for Sheen one way or the other in general but he was pretty much perfect for and in that part. I never thought of him as good so much as someone who's realizing how amoral he's been as a kind of pawn for crazy people. In his encounter with Brando he realized how easily he could have become that guy and he was killing off that part of himself so that he could live. It was his redemption. He'd have been okay with dying but he wound up defeating that part of himself. I'm not saying it was well done but there nothing close to "Yeah, the Americans are good! We're rescuing the locals from a maniac!" happening in that part (or any part) of the movie.
"Except for the point, the still point, there would be no dance, and there is only the dance. " T.S. Eliot
Follow Ups:
My point is it matters not a whit what he INTENDED, it's what actually occurs. Action always speaks louder than intellectual justification.
The movie glorifies violence, specifically, American violence. Notice how "entertainingly" the scenes of horror are filmed? Coppola wants you to enjoy them.
In fact, music is used like some sort of MTV; it livens up scenes of what should be horror, death, and devastation.
As I said, Coppola acheived the same amoral result with Puzo's pulp novel, The Godfather.
He has no moral compass: he's a subconsious worshipper of violence or an unthinking entertainer, or both or... worse.
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: