|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.230.43.205
In Reply to: Here's my problem with Borat. posted by sjb on November 3, 2006 at 09:48:49:
Borat goads his subjects along with a specific agenda in mind, but they're still responsible for everything that comes out of their mouths. Does it really matter how pleasant a guy can be if he thinks genocide isn't such a bad idea? In that light, I have a hard time calling him "good natured." Take a look at the clip, linked below.-Anthony
Follow Ups:
But "Borat" ambushes plenty of people who don't think the Holocaust was a good thing.This part of the L.A. Times review of the movie echoes and better expresses my sentiments on his brand of comedy.
"But because Cohen is intentionally provocative, willing to mock whoever crosses his path, he ends up baiting the harmless and playing ordinary people for fools just because they are gullible and had the bad luck to run into him, and it's here that the laughter especially sticks in your throat. The car dealer who doesn't object when Borat makes anti-Gypsy remarks may not be a secret racist but simply someone who decided it was a mug's game to get further involved with an obvious lunatic. And the Southern dining society that gets mercilessly humiliated seems to have committed no sin worse than earnestness, credulity and hospitality.
With his corrosive brand of take-no-prisoners humor that scalds on contact, Cohen is the most intentionally provocative comedian since Lenny Bruce and early Richard Pryor, with a difference. For unlike those predecessors, there is a mean-spiritedness, an every-man-for-himself coldness about his humor. The one kind of laughter you won't find in "Borat" is that which acknowledges shared humanity."
...that DEA guy into discussing a spread of illicit drugs on the table before them. You could see in the poor guy's eyes the growing realization that something was sorely amiss but he *stayed in character* as the agent. No one got hurt by that, and it was a great impromptu performance on both sides.Word also has come that some of Borat was scripted/staged -- just as it's quite apparent Ali G. was.
That's not a bad assessment, but I think the author and many others are taking Cohen's style of humor way too seriously. Can we be so prideful that we can't take a joke? Cohen's routine is a kind of acid test in that regard.Anyone can be made to look silly and I'm certainly no exception. Also, nobody with a decent foothold in the world is above being mocked... hell, I deserve it. Supposing a person like Cohen managed to pull one over on me, Mr. Innocent Nice Guy, well shame on me for being naive, but above all else I think I possess enough humility to laugh at myself for it. I suppose that a person who doesn't have that ability would probably despise Cohen's style the most.
I don't think laughing at ourselves is just important, it's necessary. We're all fairly ridiculous creatures... and anyone who doesn't think so it just itchin' for it!
-Anthony
It seems to me that anybody can take advantage of unsuspecting people (as in "Borat") or film people doing some of the most childish and stupid acts (as in "Jackass"). Is the paying audience that desperate for entertainment that they'll stoop so low to pay for this?
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: