|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
58.179.111.64
In Reply to: Not correct posted by rico on November 12, 2006 at 09:05:56:
As I said, I have some DVDs which are labelled "Wide Screen". The films on these discs have a screen aspect of 2.35:1. The DVDs are mastered in letterbox format for a 4:3 screen . Displayed at full screen width on my 16:9 TV, the picture format is wider than 2.35:1 and the images are stretched in the horizontal plane. The black bars above and below the image are taller than those with an anamorphic 2.35:1 film. Correct film proportions on these discs are restored if they are displayed as a 4:3 program.Off hand, the most interesting example of this phenomenon that I can give are my copies of Halloween and Halloween II. Both are labelled in exactly the same way on the packaging with a banner that says "Wide Screen" at the top of the front cover and are labelled as "Wide Screen 2.35:1" on the back cover. Neither package refers to display screen format anywhere and, looking at the 2 films, one would assume that both are identical in film and display screen format details. Halloween is mastered for a 16:9 display and displays correctly. Halloween II has been mastered for a 4:3 screen and only displays correctly when I set my screen to 4:3 aspect. Viewed at full screen width, everyone looks fatter than they really are and the actual image height is significantly less than the image height of Halloween.
Note that I live in Australia and these are the local PAL release versions of these 2 films so the situation may be different with NTSC copies in the States.
Wide screen labelling obviously refers only to the original film aspect ratio for some releases.
Follow Ups:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: