|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.200.116.138
In Reply to: You chose to do so for the incompetant Die Hard? posted by RGA on December 18, 2006 at 19:29:35:
I think you are perhaps getting a little bent out of shape by people pointing out just how extremely stupid casino Royale is. In fact die Hard is far more consistant than casino Royale by a country mile. That is the very thing that makes Die hardf acceptable and Casino Royale garbage. i think the big picture you are missing here is there is a difference between a movie maker asking us to suspend certain disbeliefs and a movie maker just being stupid. In the case of Casino Royale you have one of the most clear cut cases of pure stupidity.
Follow Ups:
Actually there is little that is stupid about Casino Royale and certainly nothing evidenced by you. The Audience is perfectly able to fill in cutaway scenes - not everything needs to be spoon fed to the audience.Die Hard's Ground police chief asks you to leave your brain at the door -- his character alone undermines the entire film because as far as I can tell it is to fill time for a woefully thin plot.
vitriol about movies they don't like and feel the need to slam whole groups of people for liking or simply enjoying a movie.
The same is true in reverse. Always strange when people slam others for not liking a movie that they deem worhty.
I do not care that people don't like Casino Royale - but supporting the view with faulty arguments is not fair to the film or those who did like it. Comedy is the easiest - I do not like Pet Detective because I just didn't think it was funny. I can not prove to people, nor would I care to, why it is not funny. Obviously many people felt it was a laugh riot - after all they made a second one.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: