Films/DVD Asylum

• They were intentional, according to IMDB's film trivia remarks. - TAFKA Steve 17:17:27 01/08/07 (2)
  In Reply to: Only the director knows but I would say yes. * posted by mr grits on January 8, 2007 at 16:31:24:

  But they got in the way during the rest of the duration of the continuous shot, so they were digitally removed later in the scene.
  
  

  ---

  • It was an but intentionally left in. - Harmonia 10:24:53 01/09/07 (1)
    In Reply to: They were intentional, according to IMDB's film trivia remarks. posted by TAFKA Steve on January 8, 2007 at 17:17:27:

    Don't believe everything you read on IMDB.

    With a shot that long and complex, obviously there weren't many takes, despite meticulous rehearsal.

    In the editing room, it was the take with the "blood" on the lense that was obviously the best, and Cuaron's co-editor convinced him this was the shot to use. Cuaron had imnitially thought the spatters spoiled the take, but decided to use it anyway as it conveyed the feeel and emotion of being in the moment so well.

    This is according to interviews with Cuaron and Clive Owen...who should know.

    
    
    

    ---

    • I meant to say "an accident" that was left in. - Harmonia 10:25:56 01/09/07 (0)
      In Reply to: It was an but intentionally left in. posted by Harmonia on January 9, 2007 at 10:24:53:

      Damned sticky keyboard. I hate Dell.
      
      

      ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---