 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.67.53.106
In Reply to: blood on the lens. posted by TAFKA Steve on January 8, 2007 at 09:09:44:
In interviews and in the press kit materials Cuaron & Owen said that the "blood" on the lens was an accident that was left in for a bit. Cuaron originally didn't want to use that take because of it, but in the editing room it was apparent that this take was by far the best. His co-editor talked him inot using the take with the spatters.Obviously, there was much rehearsal and very few of these long takes.
Follow Ups:
After all, I paid $4 at a Marcus Theatre to see the film.Thanks for the corrections to the IMDB info, anyway.
I dunno that I believe everything in press kits either. Or interviews. But really beware of IMDB and Wikepedia. Since I've seen the info confirmed 2x from separate sources, it seems reasonable.You can get presskits on ebay. Or ever better, you can borrow them from friends who are execs at the local film festival. ;-) The interviews are on the web.
Of course that may just mean that Encyclopedia Brittanica isn't very accurate.
Don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining.
It's a great idea, Wikepedia is, but in certain entries I have extensive knowledge of I've seen more than a few errors and misinformation.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
