|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
220.236.79.69
In Reply to: Ann Hathaway was way too pretty ... posted by Jimmy NYC on February 22, 2007 at 08:46:30:
I thought the film tedious and contrived and the supposed transformation just a sad tale of if you spend money you will become a happy shiney person.
Calling Hathaway fat was enough for hoots of derision. Calling her failure to buy into the norms of this self serving group of Manhattanites "frumpy" was a return to 1950's stereotyping and conformity.
I thought the film hugely conservative and hugely boring. A film for the Bush generation...
Follow Ups:
I come to the Asylum to get a little relief from all the politico's...I don't give a f**k about your political opinions or anyone elses on here. There are plenty of outlets for you and me to express our opinions. And no I am not a Bush supporter.(since that was probably going to be your predictable reply).
... was about those who want to return to a ficticious past where everything was fine and dandy.
It was previously called "Reaganite" or "Thatcherite".
If you don't think such things have parallels, and I didn't say that they were used as blatant political propaganda, in culture then that is your choice.
I think its a film which is very much a part of the times.
... was meant to be a reference to the tired cliche of films where the glasses wearing secretary (female of course) would take off her glasses and let her hair down and suddenly her boss (what a surprise... a MAN!!!) would suddenly bust his pants trying to get a date with her.
I'm impressed at the extent you run with the ball
... that's a soccer term by the way!
I guess if they wanted her to be slim and sexy at the end, they had to cast someone slim and sexy at the beginning.
Probably lucky it wasn't turned into an Eddie Murphy vehicle...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: