|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.86.136.68
In Reply to: "When Al Gore takes the stage *twice*, and he's the *highlight* of the show..." posted by clarkjohnsen on February 26, 2007 at 09:37:04:
Since you were all watching it -what did you want or hope to see ? nt
Follow Ups:
I was also working on my laptop, so it went by painlessly. But as far as its level - it was truly pathetic. The cheer girl was barely smart enough not to interfere with much, and that was her main contribution. If she stayed home things would have been "even more better".I guess I just wanted to see a few faces I like.
The most revolting moment was Al Gore on stage. But I guess we needed that reminder of what those people are.
Isn't calling something revolting - complaining?
Like I said - I saw pretty much what I expected (not much), a few more and better boobs would be great, but hey, you can't have Scarlett in every TV frame!Ah, yes, and not seeing Leonardo would have been nice too...
On a more serious note... have you noticed that each year fewer and fewer good actors appear there? You have a bunch of the usuals, and then not much more. I think the show used to be far more perky like ten years ago.
nt
d
... at least YOU never disappoint, clark.
Must be clark's cross to carry... while everyone else can get away with posting links to articles, he gets his balls ripped off by some vigilant individuals every time.
z
I thought you only gave AuPh hardon.
... blah blah blah.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: