|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
205.144.237.58
In Reply to: Sophie Scholl: The Final Days. Disappointing. (Spoiler) posted by tinear on March 15, 2007 at 09:21:36:
Being based on transcripts it was a very precise and moving film. The interrogator was brilliantly portrayed. My biggest shock was seeing the mini-guillotine.Sophie was faced with imprisonment or death for handing out leaflets. Far from the society we live in...unless you imagination tells you differently.
Follow Ups:
Now, unless you can "see" faces when you read transcripts, I doubt you can judge acting.
As for the transcripts...yeah, I know what artistic license is, do you?
I don't know what the heck your "liberal" comment is about but I'm sure the reader will notice your clever tagline.
Those things never bothered me. You can hardly spoil the artistic impression.
and people should have the option of reading or not. Artistic impressions my remain intact but if you've never seen something it's nice not to know how it ends.Also, Tin's suggestion wasn't based on there being actual spoilers in Grits' post. He was just being defensive about being called on his bias.
the guillotine, which was a shocking and critical piece of the ending.
To have known it was coming would be to very much lessen the impact.
a good natured ribbing.
In fact I bailed out somewhere along the way, as without having seen the film it didn't mean much to me.So I think it is largely self-regulating. We tend to read with more attention posts about films that touched us in some way. When I read about something I have not yet seen, I quickly forget most of it.
But that's me. I don't recall been annoyed too many times by someone giving out the ending to me. Somehow I am usually able to work around it, without even thinking about it.
But I guess there **could** be cases that would have irritated me.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: