 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
4.235.200.112
In Reply to: Desert Island Weekend posted by afilado on March 15, 2007 at 22:52:44:
think his three finest performances were in "The Young Philadelphians," "Long Hot Summer" and "Harper."
In LHS, he played a character extremely close to that of Brando in "The Fugitive Kind," though his love interest is the store owner's young daughter, not his wife.
The contrast in their acting styles is very apparent: Brando never plays to the audience, asking for approval---if anything, he makes himself obnoxious. Newman, unfortunately, adopted the habit of grinning too widely and often, seemingly attempting to ingratiate himself to the viewer.
Anyhow, Orson Welles, Joanne Woodward, and several others enliven the film: it's so over the top it becomes grand entertainment: I believe it's based on a Faulkner short story, "The Barn Burner."
It bears, as I mentioned, a lot of similarities to the Williams story: I wonder who plagiarized whom?
Follow Ups:
I would have expressed it another way but those are spot-on observations about the contrasting styles. I take it that since you compare the two that you have a high regard for both.They are both giant entertainers - which was their abiding intention. Immensly sensual and interesting to watch no matter what they chose to do, on and off screen.
It's paradoxical that in order to make such finely drawn comments one must have the historical advantage.
artist. He studied acting with and became the most famous proponent of a certain acting style which, I believe, came from Russian theater (Stanislovski? going on really old memory, here).
Brando's fame originated from his massive success in the theater, starring in, especially, Tennessee Williams's plays.
He had the skill to play pretty much any character, combining in one impossibly talented package the charisma of a leading man with the flexibility and skill of a world-class character actor.
Newman was a very good actor, as well, though he didn't have the menace of Brando, the almost-out-of-control explosiveness. That was Brando's unique gift which early became apparent in his film career in "The Wild Ones."
Newman, as I mentioned before, early developed a grinning tendency which was irksome: his persona was one of immense conceit and this was his "wink" to his audience.
I'd have to rate James Dean ahead of Newman. Far ahead, actually.
But we're talking about massive talents here so that's hardly an insult...
...I won't argue against any of these points. And it's gratifying to read them. My remarks were strictly from a movie lover's point of view. Meant in no way to demean or glorify either Brando or Newman.My point was simply that both have provided immeasureable pleasure and inspiration over a lifetime for me, regardless of talent levels. Would I trade Hud for On the Waterfront? Or The Sting for Teahouse...? Or Judge Roy Bean....for One-Eyed Jacks? Probably. But, it would be a Sophie's choice to trade one's career for the other.
I've derived every bit as much pleasure over the years from watching Newman as from Brando.
I've been thinking recently how much I owe, how much I appreciate the transcendent influence of artists like Brando, Sydow, Hackman, Caine, Kingsley, Mifuno, Guinness, ad infinitum. They all have their particular talents. And they wanted to expose, to show themselves to us. To please us. Therefore, my remarks about entertainment. Not a trivial thing.
What I'm after here on this forum is to learn more about how to deepen my understanding and pleasure of movies. Just as I relish the personal exposure of the artist on the screen, the same goes for private revelations here.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
