 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Is the upcoming "Pearl Harbor" really necessary? posted by TAFKA Steve on May 08, 2001 at 18:26:20:
***torpedo bombs dropped from zeros directly on top of ships,Hmmmm, Steve, what's a "torpedo bomb"?
And if you stopped your zero right above the ship, and then released that torpedo...errr... bomb... errr... that torpedo bomb... would it not fall indeed right on top of ship?
Follow Ups:
> > > And if you stopped your zero right above the ship, and then released that torpedo...errr... bomb... errr... that torpedo bomb... would it not fall indeed right on top of ship? < < <It probably wouldn't be a good idea to do that, you'd have the bomb/ship blow up right beneath you. Probably not a good idea at really low altitudes.
Besides, how do you stop a Zero right above a ship? Do you use the "air brake"? :-)
Chia-Hao
Okay, I flunk war history. I meant one of these.And yes, the physics of bomb trajectories is amazing with CGI.
> > > And yes, the physics of bomb trajectories is amazing with CGI < < <Funny isn't it? You'd think they could some computing power to have decent physics models when animating CGI. But, they probably figure: "Hey, if the explosions are big enough and loud enough, no one will care or even notice!" And, unfortunately, they're probably right.
Chia-Hao
Could not get you on Chinese movies, so the bombs will do for now...***And yes, the physics of bomb trajectories is amazing with CGI.
What's CGI?
And what's amazing is how many different bombing techniques have been developed.
CGI = Computer Generated Imagery.Have a good show, Victor. Sorry I won't be there. Maybe some day...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
