Films/DVD Asylum

• Re: Is the upcoming "Pearl Harbor" really necessary? CH Chang 23:05:03 05/09/01 (0)
  In Reply to: Re: Is the upcoming "Pearl Harbor" really necessary? posted by TAFKA Steve on May 08, 2001 at 19:04:47:

  > > > And yes, the physics of bomb trajectories is amazing with CGI < < <

  Funny isn't it? You'd think they could some computing power to have decent physics models when animating CGI. But, they probably figure: "Hey, if the explosions are big enough and loud enough, no one will care or even notice!" And, unfortunately, they're probably right.

  Chia-Hao
  
  

  ---
• I knew I would get you some day on something... Victor Khomenko 20:23:01 05/08/01 (1)
  In Reply to: Re: Is the upcoming "Pearl Harbor" really necessary? posted by TAFKA Steve on May 08, 2001 at 19:04:47:

  Could not get you on Chinese movies, so the bombs will do for now...

  ***And yes, the physics of bomb trajectories is amazing with CGI.

  What's CGI?

  And what's amazing is how many different bombing techniques have been developed.
  
  
  

  ---

  • Re: I knew I would get you some day on something... TAFKA Steve 16:52:21 05/09/01 (0)
    In Reply to: I knew I would get you some day on something... posted by Victor Khomenko on May 08, 2001 at 20:23:01:

    CGI = Computer Generated Imagery.

    Have a good show, Victor. Sorry I won't be there. Maybe some day...
    
    

    ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---