|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Koji Wakamatsu and Eirin. posted by TAFKA Steve on June 19, 2001 at 15:06:03:
***photos of genitalia were made legal if presented in an artistic and "non-erotic" context.Hmmmm, I like that... genitalia in a "non-erotic" context... just wondering what sort of context that would be?
That misterious Eastern mind...
Follow Ups:
Genitalia in a "non-erotic" context: three examples.If it is a picture of a doctor measuring muscle strength in a woman's vagina, it is medical and therefore "non-erotic."
If it is a picture of a woman urinating on a dwarf wearing a leather mask and sporting a Superman tattoo, it is artistic and therefore "non-erotic."
If it is a picture of a guy whacking off to a photo of Janet Reno, it is a tragedy and definitely "non-erotic."
And a warning in case any women are contemplating visiting Japan in the summer: public display of female armpit hair is still taboo and is roughly equivalent to seeing a man walking around with one testicle exposed out of his briefs (an act which might qualify one to be a Senator from Massachusetts).
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: