|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: "Jurassic Park III" posted by the-real-CarlEber on July 31, 2001 at 02:32:00:
The first one is the best because there's lots of suspense and the raptors are used to a chilling effect. The second one has a good amount of suspense as well with more raptors and adds a T-Rex in the city. The third one while lacking in the suspense department makes up for it with smart raptors and flying dinos. The big T-Rex- crunching Spinosaurus left me kinda cold though. That was probably my main complaint in JP3. It just seemed like the big Spinosaurus should've been chasing bigger meals. Also, it was nice to take a break from the Jeff Goldblum character. I preferred Sam Neil's performance as the more respectful scientist. I always liked how he knows when and when not to run; especially when nobody else listens. I probably wouldn't mind another sequel. You just can't beat the ferocity of dinosaurs. Now all we need is a pack of raptors in the city.Rob C
Follow Ups:
I thought that t-rex in the city was the weakest point of part 2, too much like Godzilla in Tokyo, yada yada.I agree on Jeff Goldblum. Has anybody ever noticed that he always plays himself, rather than actually acting in a role?
I also agree on Spinosaurus. The main thing that was lacking with it (and is also true of the whole movie), is the sound. T-Rex in the first movie sounded 10x bigger and louder than Spinosaurus. I admit I've not heard the DTS soundtrack, but even still, I just know even the DTS version would never measure up to the first JP.
I saw it in a fairly new theater so the sound was pretty good. Plenty loud. I do remember the first movie's sound being really jacked up in the theaters. You really need to catch it in a better theater.
T-Rex in the city was way cooler than any form of Godzilla in Tokyo or New York.Rob C
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: