|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Maltin's Ratings of Sci-Fi Films (Cont'd).... posted by AudioHead on August 14, 2001 at 07:11:48:
***(Anomaly: Bladerunner rated 1.5* because of "muddled script and
totally unappealing characters".)***No, it was rated 1.5 because the reviewer was too stupid to appreciate it.
Follow Ups:
nt
No, I disagree. Much of the Malting ratings IMO, are fairly well
balanced and accurate for the most part, especially considering the
encapsulated form that must be adhered to. Maltin's
bias against violence, FX, etc. that he finds overly repugnant shows
through more than once. For example, besides Alien, he downgraded
The Thing remake for the same reason. I realize that art is a matter
of taste, but many people disagree with him on these films, if you
don't believe me, look at their ratings at www.imdb.com. - AH
Maltin does have a good feel for films in my opinion. I don't always agree with him (BladeRunner? Now come on, that movie was great despite the screwups), but I appreciate his opinions none the less. I won't list the reviewers that I disagree with (80% of the time) because it's too long a list. Usually, when movies are first released, I read their reviews. If they liked it, chances are I'll think it's crap. If they didn't like it, I'm usually the first in line!
I totally and emphatically disagree with Maltin and staff on their
ratings of Alien and Bladerunner. Usually they do a fairly good
job, but they sure boo-ooed on these! Maltin himself needs to stick
with Disney reviews and leave the sci-fi reviews to staffer Bill
Warren. - AH
Hi,
My feeling is that it's probably going to remain the best scifif movie for decades; and i don't much care what anyone else thinks about it..... It's real scifi for one thing(not a popular thing), some of the bad guys are conservative politicians(something i like), and the #2 good guy (the boyfriend) is a conservative, which, believe it or not, i liked a lot(need to balance off the first thing i like, and it also offers verisimilitude). So my reasons are liking it are partly personal, partly because i have a taste for 'hard' scifi. Never heard a reviewer let on he knew what hard scifi was.
Now i also like 'Amazon Women of the Avocado Jungle' and i loved the first Muppet Movie, so take it FWIW :)
the movie is a bad joke.
Hi,
i haven't actually read the book. Found it a bit dry, think i will give it another chance.
the little nuggets really make the book special
i miss sagan. asimov too. among other things, there was such a wonderful sense of humanity in their works. contact i read just before he passed away...its one of the few books i re-read every year or so.regards,
chiggy
***their was such a wonderful sense of humanity...***Asimov humanized robots by endowing them with a moral code of conduct, i.e.,
The Three Laws of Robotics. - AH
x
nt
I recommend "Asimov's Galaxy: Reflections On Science Fiction" - 1989
Doubleday; if you haven't already read it. It's excellent -
a collection of 66 essays which appeared as editorials in Issac
Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine from August 1981 to Mid-December
1985. - AH
nt
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: