 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: yup posted by Randy Bey on September 18, 2001 at 04:42:23:
what do you mean by your last three sentences? From a logical
viewpoint, the last statement seems inconsistent with the first
two, i.e.,in the first statement, one is distinctly visible; in the second, one
is vaguely visible, thus, in the third, wouldn't it follow that one would
be invisible, but still present (not absent)? Or is this a case of a
progressively reduced existence of an entity called "I",
presumed to be you, and not one of just visibility? Please enlighten me as I'm admittedly
unaware of the original context of these statements. - AH
Follow Ups:
More the second supposition than the first.For details, listen to Jefferson Starship, "Blows against the Empire".
Randy Bey
At first, I was iridescent
Then, I became transparent
Finally, I was absent
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
