|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
There are 19,000 movies listed!!!!
Follow Ups:
For detail and sophistication, the Martin-Porter guide pales besides the
Maltin guide. If you're skeptical, try reading the reviews of
several of the alltime great films in each guide and compare them -
Citizen Kane, Gone With The Wind, Casablanca,
The Godfather, Lawerence of Arabia, etc. I recommend the Martin-
Porter Guide as a supplement because it can compensate for some of
the conservative, family oriented bias of Matlin. Just compare Matlin's review of "Alien", which he found repugnant, most
likely for the chest-bursting scene. In contrast, Martin-Porter gives
"Alien", the positive, enthusiatic review it so richly deserves. I
don't think that Bill Warren, the sci-fi editor for
Maltin, would have ever gave the film such a negative review. That review
probably came from Old Malty himself, so my advice is to have both
(and possibly more) guides on hand for reference. - AH
My reference shelf also includes guides by Steven Scheuer, Danny Peary, Joe Bob Briggs (hilarious), the "Psychotronic Video Guide", Ephraim Katz's "Film Encyclopedia" and of course one must have Halliwell.
Peary is on my sh*t list cause of his negative review of "Forbidden
Planet"; used to have reference to the monumental ten volume set,
"The Motion Picture Guide", unfortunately, it only went up to 1973. Psychotronics is pretty cool. - AH
nt
I stopped buying or even consulting Maltin years ago in favor of Mick Martin and Marsha Porter's Video Movie Guide. It's worth it just for the cross-indexing. Maltin's reviews and sensibilities I always found to be just a little too conservative or safe as if they were written for people who only go out to rent one movie. I seem to recall that after his reviews there were initials that indicated which of his staff or stable of contributors wrote the review.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: