|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Pauline Kael set the standard for film criticism... posted by gware on April 07, 2002 at 18:33:08:
Read Roger Ebert's dissection of the film. He's the only critic I've read who had a kind word for it, Oates' performance excepted. And yes, the film is over the top but I think it's appropriate. The Oates character is desperate and gets more desperate by the minute. Plus, he may not be totally sane but he is certainly more sane than those who know he has the head and are after him to get it. Notice how Oates starts talking to the head in the bag? I won't spoil it for you by saying any more.Enjoy!
Follow Ups:
Criticism in general, has diminished in importance, ever since the Kael and Andrew Sarris left our consciousness, with the advent of the 6oclock News Tv Movie Critic. The Old Masters have been replaced by homogenized and dumbed down photocopies like Joel Seigel, Jeffrey Lyons, et al.Ebert has survived based upon the strength of his print and long form Tv show work. But even he can't hold a candle, as they used to say, to Kael and Sarris.
That movie companies now make up the critical quotes for advert blurbs, who need em anyway ?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: