|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: HDTV, Flat Panel, Wide Screen, Plasma, - need some help posted by Bruce from DC on April 05, 2002 at 08:05:32:
the problem is the 42" plasma displays currently available are NOT CAPABLE OF HIGH DEFINITION. (the 1024x1024 Sony is a technical exception...see link below)you must be capable of displaying AT LEAST 720p horizontal lines in a progressive scan (or 1080 lines interlaced: 540p skipped lines followed by the other 540p lines = 1080i), and the current crop of 42" plasmas only do 480 horizontal lines.
here's the deal: a 42" plasma has 852 pixels in 480 horizontal rows, for a total of 408960 pixels, which is not nearly enough.
however, the 50" plasmas have 1366 pixels in 768 horizontal rows,
for a total of 1049088 pixels. that means they have no problem doing 720 progressive "scans" of video information, in fact, the input is "rescaled" to 768 scans, so as to fill the entire screen.High Defintion CRTs are capable of much higher resolution, as are front and rear projection technologies. They can do the equivalent of over 2 million pixels, so you would think you'd get a much sharper picture, and of course if you project that on a 42" or 50" screen, you will. If you project that light on a huge screen, say 8 or 10 feet across you get something a bit less, but still very close to film.
but don't sit too close, and if your input is regular television programing, NTSC, it's gonna be ugly--downright nasty. That's why "line doublers and quadruplers and processors and scalers" are so often included or recommended as add-ons for large screen projection.
Very expensive.
plasma is something unique:
the quality of light and colors that the super-heated gas plasma emits is ....
oh man, you just have to see these things:
"Let's pretend the glass has got all soft like gauze, so that we can get through.
Why, it's turning into a sort of mist now, I declare!"--"Through the Looking-Glass" by Lewis Carroll
Follow Ups:
I should have said 43".The article you linked to, btw, is about 8 months old, an eternity in this business.
Yep, it does true HD but it doesn't do black and it seems to suffer from subtle image artifacts in dark scenes. Everytime I've seen this set at Tweeter it can't get past dark grey. I gotta believe were gonna see the Panny black level and the Pioneer resolution from one of these manufacturers soon for under $10k. Maybe well under.If I were Chris that's what I'd wait on.
joe
whew! where did that come from?well, i had my 15 minutes...
now my "state-of-the-art" plasma is old news...
the horror...
i guess i'll put a hole in the boat to let the water out
thanks for the heads-up Bruce
Not at all.You make a good point that everyone needs to watch out for -- there's a myriad of different formats 1080i, 720p, etc. etc. and it's hard to keep 'em all straight. So a buyer swimming around in all this has got to look out for the sharks and make sure he doesn't get bitten when he plunks down the rather large stack of bills that buying one of these things requires.
IIRC, the unit that my wife and I saw was the Pioneer jobbie that I linked to. I know it wasn't interlaced (I can tell the difference) and I don't think it was as big as 50 inches. (Her reaction immediately upon our walking into the store: "Oooh, that's nice and so thin, just like a picture!" (The had the display wall-mounted.) Our local PBS outlet was showing an HDTV broadcast about rennaisance painting -- quite the program to show off the virtues of HDTV.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: