Video Asylum

• Coner, you are thinking of composite, not component - John C. - Aussie 17:56:19 06/14/02 (1)
  In Reply to: Re: Component Video better than Video S ? posted by Coner on June 14, 2002 at 17:14:51:

  And Todd is spot on. S-video is dramatically better than composite with component a smaller step up again. If you can use component then do so and research the cable to use for maximum benefit. I have seen praise for BetterCables
  http://www.bettercables.com/index.html
  but have not had personal experience with them.

  John
  
  Peace at AA
  
  

  ---

  • Re: Coner, you are thinking of composite, not component - Coner 18:19:13 06/14/02 (0)
    In Reply to: Coner, you are thinking of composite, not component posted by John C. - Aussie on June 14, 2002 at 17:56:19:

    Yes, I guess I'll shut up and do some reading, I got mixed up
    there. ;-)
    
    

    ---
• Re: Component Video better than Video S ? - SamM 17:38:02 06/14/02 (1)
  In Reply to: Re: Component Video better than Video S ? posted by Coner on June 14, 2002 at 17:14:51:

  but you cannot get progressive via the S-Video...which kills S-Video still in the water!

  Sam
  
  

  ---

  • Re: Component Video better than Video S ? - sam9 10:05:31 06/25/02 (0)
    In Reply to: Re: Component Video better than Video S ? posted by SamM on June 14, 2002 at 17:38:02:

    May not be that important if the monitor include good quality line doubling. I've tested this with my Toshiba and you really have to look hard to see the improvement from a progressive scan source. It's there, but in actual viewing its absense takes away almost nothing.
    
    

    ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---