 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: nope. only s/pdif coaxial rca... posted by Aroc on July 09, 2002 at 12:10:41:
I should have said cheap *progressive scan" DVDP's. The cheapest DVDP's (non-progressive) often DO have coaxial digital audio outputs, mainly the ones without component video outputs. The non-progressive ones with component outputs tend to have Toslink only. I had an exchange here with Rod M not long ago, and I can say that some of the very cheap non-progressive DVDP's are not bad at all, you should definitely try one and you might be extremely satisfied with it. You could use your EVS DAC for CD, it would look much better (with good source material, most) than VHS, so don't get too caught up in the high end features. You may be happy for next to nothing $$-wise. Then you will have a better appreciation of what capability you are buying for the next time, before sinking big bucks in a virtually daily changing technology.[Dang, I'm having trouble saying what I mean today...]
Follow Ups:
Since my TV is non-progressive, I'm wondering if I should be looking at progressive players at all? Does the de-interlacer get in my way, video performance-wise? Could I get better 480i (whatever) output from a non-progressive player than a progressive one? Do progressive players inherently have compromised interlaced (not non-interaced) output? I understand - just like with audio DACs - it's the implementation of the technology - rather than the technology itself - that determines the "real" quality of the final output.> > You could use your EVS DAC for CD, it would look much better
> > (with good source material, most) than VHS, so don't get too
> > caught up in the high end featuresDo I even need a player with the Sage/Faroudja FI2200 chip? That's just the deinteracer, right? Not the MPEG decoder, correct? Does the chroma "bug" effect me since I can't view progressive material? I thought it still would. My ETA for a HDTV is currently 3-5 years at best.
I can feed toslink into my AA DTI-PRO, which feeds my EVS DAC.
> > Then you will have a better appreciation of what capability
> > you are buying for the next time, before sinking big bucks
> > in a virtually daily changing technology.That's pretty much my concern at this point. If the denon will last me three years, I'll get it. Decent analog outputs and DVD-A. That seems like an "OK" investment of $500. but if it will be embarrassed buy the new $200 players at January 2003 CES (summer 2003 release), video wise - then it's a not-so-hot investment. Even considering the audio. In that case, I'd be better of with an outboard DAC. Then I could just keep upgrading the transport and video sections. but if the Denon is going to be "about as good as it gets" for the next few years. The pendullum swings back to the denon.
Also consider john Johnson's review of the Denon DVD-1600 at Secret's website. Specifically the following quote:
...but as you will see below, I am making the Denon DVD-1600 my reference DVD player because it passed just about every one of our Benchmark tests.
Would the Panasonic RP56 not do as well? I think their [secrets] review of the RP56 listed some "combing" issues during their "Abyss" DVD tests. Here's a link to that review .
did the Denon passt his test? It doesn't look like JJ performed that tests on the DVD-1600.Assuming the DVD-1600 performs no better (or no better than it would matter to me ), it's whether the audio of the Denon is worth $300 more than the RP56. (also DVD-A) Hmmm. There's a bit more to think about than I initally thought. That's both good and bad. heheheh.
> > [Dang, I'm having trouble saying what I mean today...]
Don't worry. It's seems that I'm not doing much better myself! LOL.
:-)
I am just not big (so far) on DVDP's for music, though many like them, usually with mods. The Denon should be much better than average for that. But don't you already have a CDP? It becomes a more complicated decision when you want the DVDP to do double-duty, and I don't have a good answer for you.I think you should try a cheap non-progressive DVDP from a place where you can return it easily, or else maybe get the RP56 for cheap somewhere. I just don't believe these devices are built for the 3-5 year timeframe, I view them as disposable, however I don't really want a collection of them (like I have for CDP's). I would not recommend you buy the RP62, maybe consider the non-progressive RV32 if you want Panny and you want a current model.
The chroma bug can manifest itself even in non-progressive, but easier to see in progressive with the increased clarity. I wouldn't worry about it too much with the TV you have, not a put-down at all, I'm just saying enjoy it and you won't even notice it might be there.
The RP56/62 and Denon 1600 are of the same video quality, audio and visible build quality distinguish them.
I'm also curious to see if the RP82 will use the same MPEG decoder as the RP91 (not referring to faroudja de-interlacer).The DVD-RV32 looks good in both black and silver.
-NT
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
