|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
General consensus is that AV amp are never as good as music amp for 2-Ch stereo music. I was wondering whether flagship amps like the Yamaha AZ1 or other similarly priced AV would be as good as a music amp like the C370. Would appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Follow Ups:
Sorry. I meant to ask: would a flagship AV amp like the Yamaha AZ1 be as good in 2 ch stereo music production as a NAD C370? Anybody heard them? Thanks
A good integrated, like NAD or Cambridge A500 or Creek 4330, is going to give you WAY more performance in the same price range and comparable to A/V receivers costing 3-4 times more. With an A/V receiver, you're paying for a lot of bells 'n' whistles you don't need for simple two-channel music.Some people solve this dilemma by having a good but not overpriced A/V receiver (Yamaha, Outlaw) that has pre-amp outputs AND a good integrated. The 5- or 6-channel unit runs their HT rig, then the A/V receiver acts simply as a preamp and leaves the integrated to do the grunt work in 2-channel applications.
Yap. That's the theory but have anybody ACTUALLY tried comparing it using their own ears?btw, I did got myself a decent AV Yamaha AND a NAD C370 for that every purpose :)
It's not a direct apples-to-apples comparison, and I AM relying a bit on memory, but I have a Yamaha HTR-5150 in my home theater and a NAD C350 in my two-channel system, and with roughly equivalent sources and speakers, the C350 sounds more "there," less bright and etched, with equivalent imaging and a wider, taller and deeper soundstage.
you can find relatively high end multichannel amps (like Theta Dreadnaught) that are excellent for music reproduction. Though, if you're talking about an AV receiver, sure it's possible - but that route seems like a lost cause for numerous reasons.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: