|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Recs for 'entry-level' receiver with two sets of 5.1 analog inputs? posted by NickR on October 05, 2002 at 13:56:44:
I doubt you will find two sets of those inputs on any receiver in your price range. Check out the HK AVR325 and AVR525 (probably about $600 though). The 325 has good functionality (I have this year's model, the 320) and 7 channels of amplification (no sub amp). It has up to 8 channels analog input (7.1).IMO putting SACD through a normal A/V receiver is a contradiction in terms. Yes it will work, but is it appropriate? SACD/DVD-A=high quality, A/V receiver=low quality. Generally speaking, in comparison to what's available in separates. That said, I do it myself with DVD-A and it does sound rather good, I must admit! The HK AVR320/520 (2002 models, still available) have discrete amplifiers, and if you open them up you will see that ~75% of the interior volume is devoted to the amplifiers and heat sinks, and that they are surprisingly well built (I was shocked). IMO these are the best feature/sound units at the top of your price range.
Very shortly (or right now, elsewhere) you will be able to get a universal disc player, so that sort of quality level might be more appropriate for hooking up to a A/V receiver, and only one 5.1 analog input set will be needed.
Follow Ups:
They started selling refurbished units online! Get a 320 for either $349 or $399. It has 5.1 inputs, maybe even 7.1?
Would like your opinion on the newer HK receivers. I have an older AV20 that needs to be upgraded in my video system. I orginally chose the HK because it had a better sound than most midfi stuff (I have a serious two channel system in another room and while willing to compromise on sound quality I couldn't stand typical midfi sound). Do the new ones still have the sound quality of the older ones?THanks
I know what you mean about playing a hi-res format thru an a/v receiver. At this point I can't justify the cost of 'real' processors and amps, etc. so I think a receiver is my best "enjoyment per dollar" approach.I'll also check out the universal players since that would eliminate the need for two sets of inputs.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: