 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Denon AVR-4802 vs Rotel RSX-1065 posted by williak on January 09, 2003 at 13:01:06:
Austin:I am sure you are well informed and that your comments have merit, but I was hoping for some feedback regarding the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the 2 receivers mentioned.
Peter
Follow Ups:
Peter,Both the Denon and the Rotel are competent receivers. The 4802, with which I have a good deal of familiarity, is a step up from the 1065. More channels, bigger & better amps, cleaner sound. The 4802 has a horrible remote, the Atkis 8000. Neither of the units provide bass management on the analog inputs, so an ICBM or BM'd player is in order for hirez audio. One nice thing about the Denon is the alternate speaker setup. You can wire both dipole and direct rad side surrounds. They will be switched automatically depending on source. This is very handy for HT/hirez multi-channel.
As I said in my previous post, I really wouldn't recommend the 4802 at this time but between the two you are considering, I'd go with the Denon. Best of luck with your new setup.
Austin
Peter,It is a difficult decesion to make. I to had to make a choice. Both are great products. You cannot go wrong. As Austin mentioned, it has many more bells and whistles...more features. Ask yourself this question: Can I afford the the denon which is more expensive: or does it fit in my buget? If yes is your answer, then proceed and purchase the avr 4802. In the end I to , chose the Denon avr 4802. I have no regrets. Actually, I was also interested in the processor by rotel rsp 1066. good luck.
Andrew
Austin:You seem to have some good ideas, but try to understand that I am closer to novice than expert. Since I'm not looking to create the ultimate system, it would seem better if I kept things simple and straight forward. That said, I think I'll go with the 4802. I'm confident it'll be a good choice, and I'll be happy. But I appreciate your advice.
Thanks........Peter
Peter,
If you are a novice - STOP! Do not pass go - do not spend $2000 on a receiver that is at the same time both obsolete and over the top for your needs.I don't think twice about holding my tongue when I see a novice blowing $500 on their first foray into HT - they'll learn and half a grand's a reasonable price of admission.
But the kind of bucks you're talking about calls for a bit of guidance from someone who's been there. Please re-read my posts on this topic. Then, as you've started to do already, continue posting on the HT boards where you can get a much better grounding than on an audiophile board which necessarily caters to high-end audio (which HT is definitely NOT!). Research, discuss, and audition. Repeat until you gain the confidence to proceed.
The fewer preconceived notions you go into this process with, the better result you will come out of it with. The alternative is a great deal of wasted time and money with EXACTLY the same end result.
Best of luck and I hope you enjoy the journey.
Austin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
