|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: high-def TV is better than current DVD posted by audioman on January 23, 2003 at 19:54:55:
Hi Audioman,Nothing wrong with your dvd setup, HDTV is just plain better. DVD was developed to make the most of conventional TV - with wide-screen anamorphic being something of an afterthought. Basically, DVDs are based on 480 lines of resolution while HD is based on 720 or 1080 lines.
There has been quite a lot of talk about HD-DVD, but talk is cheap. Compeating technologies and Hollywood concerns have slowed development to a crawl. I have read about different laser technologies and encryptions that may be used, but nothing yet regarding likely display resolutions. Should be out sometime this century.
Follow Ups:
Hahahaha.Very good response Charles. I guess I just could not understand why a cable signal blew away my dvd players picture when I was under the impression that " it didn't get much better than dvd "...
Because I am using a RPJ set, my RPJ screen looks acceptable with dvd, no longer great when now compared with HD cable. In comparison, the dvd now looks closer to what analogue cable used to. I guess I should now select the best affordable progressive scan, de-interlacing player I can afford. They say the newer Pioneer 47a is good, yes?
The Denon 2800 MKII is in the same price range and a better DVD player.
Can you please elaborate a little on your findings. I have the Denon here comparing it to the much lesser priced Panasonic RP-56. Now, the Panny has no where near the build quality and pales in comparison during music playback, however; I find it is on par in the video domain. I have also just brought home an older Pioneer DV-37 and the Pioneer has a clearly better colour saturation ( Note, on my set-up )
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: