|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: hi late posted by Mart on December 13, 1999 at 22:37:04:
hi,
no, meant the processors. Wringing every last bit of resolution out of movies is great, but even with my funky old pre/pro it continually surprises me how movies come to life. The theaters around here
are acoustically challenged, to put it politely. In stereo, i understand what you want, it makes perfect sense there. In movies, the old saw about diminishing returns kicks in faster, because they have less resolution to begin with ( by and large ). The conclusion, from where i sit, is to
put together a solid HT, but save the insanity for the stereo part of it.
Which is why i put myself to sleep counting high end preamps jumping over
a fence ;)
I read your post a couple times & it still makes no sense to me. I think it was grmmaticly challenged.What I want is soild imaging which HT is reknown for by using single real speaker for vocals & stereo-like image-steering from stage left to right & back. In a sense I want a dead stable crisp image that's entirely mobile.
I also want tube-like natural neutrality that generates enormous depth that my Krell will propell forward into a room, because I can't handle a too laid back image but adore depth.
hi,
i don't think that level of quality exists yet. My intuition tells me that current formats like Dolby Digital can't do it. Movie standards will likely continue to call for a flat freq response. The pleasant distortions that create stereo image, and depth, are not part of that world. Some smart guy may find a work around, but i haven't heard anything that even comes close to what you want.
you initially scared me with your title since I was never enthusiastic about Paradigm speakers, except the active line.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: