|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: DLP vs. PLASMA posted by tower23 on April 14, 2003 at 12:34:28:
Well, according to this guy, plasma displays are on their way out for a few reasons. First, they're heavier than their LCD counterparts, they cost more to make per unit (more on that in a second), and they use more electricity. LCDs currently cost more, but that's because they have to build factories and pay for all the tooling to make these bigger monitors. The actual per unit cost of an LCD screen is less than the plasma display, they're lighter, they produce brighter pictures, and will be able to hit higher resolutions... but the prices are still going to be high for a while... maybe the next year or so.As for DLP, the one problem a lot of people have with it is that you can see rainbows on the screen. This has a lot to do with the color wheel that DLPs use to produce the picture. Some people see them straight out, but almost everyone can train their brains to ignore them. You can read more about that in nearly any review of a DLP projector, but this page at www.howstuffworks.com gives an idea how DLP works.
As for the best solution, I think that that varies for every situation. DLP has a tighter projection picture than LCD, but then there's the rainbow effect to consider. You don't have to worry about rainbows with LCD, but the space between pixels gives it a screendoor effect. This usually disappears when you get to seating distance, but some people also soften the focus a little bit to make it less of an issue (which is fine since most LCD projectors are almost too sharp anyway). Then there are the flat screens where you don't have to worry about projection, but the cost is higher for a smaller picture. Basically, you're going to have to compromise somewhere, but where you compromise is the big choice.
Follow Ups:
Plasma screens are the hot ticket today but the Sharp Aquos LCD panels are very nice. Sharp recently came out with a 37" model that is light weight, very thin, very low power, perfectly quiet, and with an exceptionally nice picture. I was considering a plasma screen for my H.T. but decided to get a plain ole CRT TV and wait another year or two for LCD's (or another technology) to come on strong.I wasn't that impressed with the rear projection Samsung DLP compared to plasma but I was very impressed with the Sharp Aquos LCD panel. Only problem is the very high price compared to the other technologies. I'm also skeptical of the plasma screens because most of them have a horendous buzz at altitude... I'm near Denver where our "flatlands" start at 5000-feet... I'm at 6500 feet.
I'm hoping that LCD's or another technology takes over in the not too distant future and for now I'm enjoying my 34" 16:9 Sony CRT... (bulky and heavy beast!)
http://www.sharp-usa.com/products/ModelLanding/0,1058,1040,00.html#
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: