Video Asylum

Posted by chris e. (A) on June 16, 2003 at 01:59:45

In Reply to: But you got to admit... posted by lwang on June 15, 2003 at 21:29:20:

As I cautioned, I didn't use either for music only listening (I run 2 channel analog with Verdier-Lamm-Gamut-Graham-Lyra Parnassus with Kharma Ceramique 1.0 speakers). However, for HT soundtracks (same system as above but with addition of Genesis center channel and Definitive BP2000 as rear surrounds and Meridian amps for center and surrounds) I've found the Rotel to be every bit as good as the 565/562v. Do keep in mind that my 565/562v were getting on in age although I did have the most recent eprom chip in the 565. The advantage of the Meridian is probably best experienced with straight music listening. For the HT realm, I actually prefer the integration of sound (remember, I'm using somewhat different speakers all around so integration is an issue) and ease of use from the Rotel to the Meridian. I didn't expect this at all nor was I terribly happy at having gear costing about $5K underperforming the relatively inexpensive Rotel unit but such is life. Go figure.

As everyone says, your mileage may vary. Let's face it, this stuff is VERY idiosyncratic to one's specific system and room acoustics (and personal listening biases).

By the way, don't misinterpret my comments about the Meridian equip -- I think it is excellent gear and I've found folks at Meridian to be VERY helpful about inquiries. I just think that the Rotel is perhaps one of those occasional items that is more reasonably priced having excellent performance.