|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Coupla questions posted by 3moons on August 06, 2003 at 19:49:41:
Most people run video signal through an A/V amp for reasons not involving picture quality -- they don't have enough inputs into their TV (probably not a problem in your case), they want to use on-screen menus, or it's simply more convenient to let the receiver do the switching. You won't improve picture quality running a signal through your low-buck receiver; in fact, if anything you'll degrade it. Also, running an S-video signal into a receiver and a component signal from receiver to monitor will NOT "upgrade" the signal to component. S-video in, S-video out even through component wires.Myself, I prefer direct connections whenever possible. I have two component inputs into my Panasonic 47" widescreen -- one for a DVD player and one for the HDTV set-top box. Any other future connections (VCR, video game) will be made via S-video.
My recommendation is to run component video from your set-top box directly into the TV and either a digital coax cable (if your receiver accepts one) or a set of interconnects from the set-top box into your receiver. An HDTV set should have two sets of component inputs; if not, S-video from the DVD player should provide a more than adequate picture quality.
Then, later, upgrade to a better receiver. eCost.com sells good ones these days for about $250-300, 5.1 and even 6.1 models. You'll be happy you did.
Follow Ups:
Sorry, just to clarify, when I read "receiver" I was thinking amp and you're referring to the satellite set-top box (STB in Asylum parlance). I don't think you'd see an appreciable difference in picture quality on a 36" monitor going from S-video to component.However, if you decided to upgrade to HDTV, you might as well get the most bang from your buck and run component wires directly into your set.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: