 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: I've got this combo posted by chris e. on December 10, 2003 at 02:03:59:
I've seen huge differences in PQ between non-progressive Cambridge Audio and Arcam DVD players and EAD DVDmaster w/ Sil504 de-interlacer displayed on a Sharp9000. Kind of defeats the idea that the Sharp FPs have excellent de-interlacers built-in. Nevertheless, huge video improvement over what I had before.I'm currently running component and I'm anxiously waiting to read about successful implementations with DVI and the Sharp. I'm holding off until I get a good warm and fuzzy a DVI-capable player can talk to the 10000 using a 15-16m DVI cable. Not that there are a lot of DVI-capable players to choose from at the moment. A couple of low-budget players with known issues and the Denon-5900.
Ever play with S-video to the Sharp ? Re: (non-HD) Cable box does not have component out. Not that I expect much from non-upsampled cable broadcasts on a 110" screen.
Follow Ups:
I'm actually using my sharp here in London (I commute between US and UK so the Sony projector is in the US and the sharp is here in the UK). The advantage here is that we use a PAL tv system which has much better resolution than the US NTSC system. The result is that svideo (from a svhs recorder) to the sharp on a 96" screen (what I use here) is fairly reasonable and not all that worse than dvd's. What I've never seen is true HD on the sharp since we don't have that here in the UK. I'd like to hook it up one of these days and compare it with my sony back in the US.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
