Video Asylum

• Re: Dolby Pro-Logic II - Kal Rubinson 08:20:55 03/30/04 (8)
  In Reply to: Re: Dolby Pro-Logic II posted by lowrider on March 30, 2004 at 02:48:57:

  Well, it certainly helps many stereo recordings but it ain't as good as real MCH.
  
  

  ---

  • Re: Dolby Pro-Logic II - Lowrider 10:24:32 03/30/04 (7)
    In Reply to: Re: Dolby Pro-Logic II posted by Kal Rubinson on March 30, 2004 at 08:20:55:

    Many discs have a superior PCM track, so I prefer DPLII with those instead of the MCH track...
    Antonio Melo Ribeiro
    
    

    ---

    • Name some, please. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 13:17:04 03/30/04 (6)
      In Reply to: Re: Dolby Pro-Logic II posted by lowrider on March 30, 2004 at 10:24:32:

      mt
      
      

      ---

      • The Keith Jarrett Trio... - Lowrider 14:01:08 03/30/04 (5)
        In Reply to: Name some, please. (NT) posted by Kal Rubinson on March 30, 2004 at 13:17:04:

        Live at open theater east...
        Antonio Melo Ribeiro
        
        

        ---

        • Re: The Keith Jarrett Trio... - Kal Rubinson 18:11:43 03/30/04 (4)
          In Reply to: The Keith Jarrett Trio... posted by lowrider on March 30, 2004 at 14:01:08:

          Label? Anything classical?
          
          

          ---

          • Re: The Keith Jarrett Trio... - Lowrider 02:16:38 03/31/04 (3)
            In Reply to: Re: The Keith Jarrett Trio... posted by Kal Rubinson on March 30, 2004 at 18:11:43:

            Cammon, you can look that up in the net, I bet there aren´t more with the same tittle... ;)

            Some Opera DVDs also sound better in PCM, actually it happens more with Jazz and Opera DVDs...

            Usually Rock and Pop dont have PCM tracks anyway, or they just have PCM, like Dire Straits "Sultans of swing", a couple of Maddona´s with videos, for instance...
            Antonio Melo Ribeiro
            
            

            ---

            • Sure. - Kal Rubinson 09:09:40 03/31/04 (2)
              In Reply to: Re: The Keith Jarrett Trio... posted by lowrider on March 31, 2004 at 02:16:38:

              Thanks for the information. ;-) As for the classical (lack of) suggestions, I was hoping for something specific.

              My experience with DPL II on the Fosgate FAP V1 is that I preferred the discrete SACD or DVD-A MCH over the DPL in every instance I tried. DPL was great with stereo-only sources and those specifically encoded for it.

              Kal
              
              

              ---

              • Re: Sure. - Lowrider 03:05:13 04/01/04 (1)
                In Reply to: Sure. posted by Kal Rubinson on March 31, 2004 at 09:09:40:

                I was wondering why the questions, now I think I understand, I dont have DVD-A or SACD, I am only comparing with DTS and DD 5.1, also, PCM is not always superior...

                I am not home, so I cannot check the exact DVDs, but there is another from Miles Davies that has a fantastic PCM 24 bits track + DD 5.1
                Antonio Melo Ribeiro
                
                

                ---

                • Ah! - Kal Rubinson 07:54:06 04/01/04 (0)
                  In Reply to: Re: Sure. posted by lowrider on April 01, 2004 at 03:05:13:

                  I see. My comparisons were between discrete MCH and DPL.
                  
                  

                  ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---