Video Asylum

Posted by jbmcb (A) on November 19, 2004 at 09:04:00

In Reply to: Re: OTOH, I'd still rather have separates. posted by Estes on November 19, 2004 at 06:22:34:

Actually, I'm getting a receiver 'cause it's (relatively) cheap, offers more features-per-buck than a seperate, provides good-enough amplification for surrounds, and does it all in one box, in that order of importance.

I was bouncing between getting a nice, used surround processor and a multichannel amp, and a really nice, year or two-old receiver. For the same price, you just can't get a seperate surround processor with all the features as a medium/high-end receiver. For $800, I can get a last-year model Yamaha receiver with:
-Just about every surround decoder available (Except PLIIx)
-Automatic speaker level adjustment with microphone
-Very flexible bass management (important for my maggies)
-Easy on-screen setup
-Component video switching

A similar seperate surround processor at that price wouldn't have half the features (I was looking at used Meridian 561, Rotel and Lexicon gear) Then tack on a good quality 5-channel amplifier that's rock-solid at 4-ohms (the Yamaha has no problem with maggies) and you're looking at another $700-$900. So for about twice as much you're buying some flexibility (not *that* much more, the Yamaha has pre-outs and can be used as a standalone processor), but loosing a bunch of nice features and using up more rackspace.

I'd love a Meridian 561 sitting on a nice NAD or Adcom multichannel amp, but the flexibility you gain is far outweighed by the features you loose and the price you pay.

/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/