|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
209.170.179.136
In Reply to: Just bought our first wide-screen LCD TV--and we hate it posted by bigi on September 1, 2005 at 02:46:04:
The problem is the input signal. The LCD monitors can have wonderful pictures with a much more accurate color and finer detail, but you have to deliver a good digital signal to the set to get those results. An analog signal from a perfectly good antenna can be less than half of the resolution of the panel, so you are viewing the TVs image at half of the available resolution. That means that twice as many pxels are being used as needed to display the image full size and it results in odd artifacts like blocks of color that look pastel rather than clear, gradients of color.
If you connect a satellite (you can get satellite reception anywhere you have a clear view of the sky, think about it) antenna and subscribe to that service, you can get some much better digital signals. Even a few high definition channels and in a few years, it will all look that sharp. In my area, I can get 7 or 8 free high definition stations by antenna. You may need an additional tuner to get that as some TV's don't include such a tuner, but you may have one built-in even. If you see those stations, you will be amazed at how much better it is even than the old tube TV with an analog signal. These are some tough times for transition between formats for both broadcasters and consumers. No one product gets it all done that doesn't cost a fortune. A $1000 scaler would help to bridge the gap and make all sources more enjoyable, but that's of little concellation to someone who has already paid that for a new TV. The problem with getting an analog set now is that you will have just the opposite problem in a few years when all transmission is digitized, with the same rotten results. Probably best to get satellite service now and wait it out. Tough call and tough break. It would have been ideal to have the analog set collapse right as the digital broadcasts became standard so there was no growing pain, but Murhy's Law does not allow that.
-Bill
Follow Ups:
Thanks for that. I think I now understand why I don't like this TV.As for satellite, yes, in theory, it's available everywhere. Unfortunately, neighbors' trees block our view of the available satellites here in England, so satellite reception is out. Also no cable in our neighborhood. Also no terrestrial digital where we live (Britain is supposed to have universal terrestrial digital in a few years).
We've decided to take this TV back tomorrow. We're going back to old-fashioned CRT.
Cheers,Ivan
Out of interest, before taking the set back can you not at least take it to someone you know who has satelite TV and plug the SCART in, just to verify that it was the signal and not the TV?You may want to reinvestigate Plasma or LCD if you eventually get terrestrial digital, and HDTV takes off.
Best Regards,
Chris redmond.
I've tried a DVD, and the picture is fine, pretty much as I expected.However, I rarely watch DVDs. This TV was bought primarily to watch via terrestrial analogue signals. As I've explained elsewhere in this thread, we don't have access to cable, or satellite (trees in the way), or terrestrial digital (not in this area yet). There seems little point in paying extra for a poorer picture using the existing signal.
Given the signal we do have, and the purpose for which we want a TV, our best choice appears to be old-fashioned CRT.
Cheers,Ivan
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: