Video Asylum

Re: That's the best explanation I've received so far

80.41.97.221

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email Next ] [ Video Asylum ]

chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com

(A)

In Reply to: That's the best explanation I've received so far posted by bigi on September 1, 2005 at 13:55:14:

Out of interest, before taking the set back can you not at least take it to someone you know who has satelite TV and plug the SCART in, just to verify that it was the signal and not the TV?
You may want to reinvestigate Plasma or LCD if you eventually get terrestrial digital, and HDTV takes off.

Best Regards,
Chris redmond.

Follow Ups:

I'm already sure it's the signal that's the problem - bigi 02:34:57 09/11/05 (0)
I've tried a DVD, and the picture is fine, pretty much as I expected.
However, I rarely watch DVDs. This TV was bought primarily to watch via terrestrial analogue signals. As I've explained elsewhere in this thread, we don't have access to cable, or satellite (trees in the way), or terrestrial digital (not in this area yet). There seems little point in paying extra for a poorer picture using the existing signal.
Given the signal we do have, and the purpose for which we want a TV, our best choice appears to be old-fashioned CRT.

Cheers,
Ivan
"What's neo-realism?" "No money."

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.