|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.200.116.135
In Reply to: 2.1 Channel HT ? posted by Pinkus on January 22, 2006 at 07:37:29:
Should work fine. Just run the red and white analog outputs to the aux or CD imputs of your receiver. You can hook up the 2 channel speakers as Set A on the receiver and the Sub as set B Then A+B gets you both. Or you can hook the Sub as set A and then connect the 2 channel speakers from the Sub.You don't need any decoders to get 2.1 from a standard DVD
My 2.1 setup uses a 1971 JVC receiver as the main power.
Follow Ups:
I do not recommend this suggestion as some AVRs put the A and B loads in series when both are selected and some introduce an impedance-adjusting resistor. You are better off running the sub from the dedicated sub output on the system (if you have such).If not and you must use speaker-level connections, connect all to the same sets of terminals or run the main L/R through the sub's network.
It would easier to give better advice if you posted the specific amp, speakers and sub you are using.
I was thinking of a situation with an older stereo amp w/o a sub terminal. If the amp has a sub output by all means use it.
Here is my current equipment: SF Auditors for L&R speakers, SF sub, and currently Krell HTS7.1 as my processor, which I am replacing/supplementing (not sure yet) with the Nagra Pll.
won't the Krell do bass management and feed the sub independantly?
The amp is on old 5 channel Carver 505x. Yes, the Krell does have bass management, and at the moment it is doing just that. My point was, since I have only 2 channels, can I not replace the Krell HTS with a good 2 channel analog preamp, and feed the sub line level signals from the analog preamp ? I realize that my speakers will be run full range, but as per Sumiko, I can run the Auditor's full range, and the speakers should be fine.
Yup. As suggested elsewhere.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: