 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
216.165.126.10
In Reply to: Re: 2.1 Channel HT ? posted by DavidLD on January 22, 2006 at 08:59:38:
I do not recommend this suggestion as some AVRs put the A and B loads in series when both are selected and some introduce an impedance-adjusting resistor. You are better off running the sub from the dedicated sub output on the system (if you have such).If not and you must use speaker-level connections, connect all to the same sets of terminals or run the main L/R through the sub's network.
It would easier to give better advice if you posted the specific amp, speakers and sub you are using.
Kal
Follow Ups:
I was thinking of a situation with an older stereo amp w/o a sub terminal. If the amp has a sub output by all means use it.
Here is my current equipment: SF Auditors for L&R speakers, SF sub, and currently Krell HTS7.1 as my processor, which I am replacing/supplementing (not sure yet) with the Nagra Pll.Thanks
won't the Krell do bass management and feed the sub independantly?Kal
The amp is on old 5 channel Carver 505x. Yes, the Krell does have bass management, and at the moment it is doing just that. My point was, since I have only 2 channels, can I not replace the Krell HTS with a good 2 channel analog preamp, and feed the sub line level signals from the analog preamp ? I realize that my speakers will be run full range, but as per Sumiko, I can run the Auditor's full range, and the speakers should be fine.Thanks
Yup. As suggested elsewhere.Kal
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
