|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Acurus ACT3 processor vs. ? posted by The Rock Man on January 28, 2001 at 10:19:29:
For less than $2k you'd be better off with a used B&K Ref10 or 20. For just over $2k you can have the latest and also may be the greatest B&K Ref30.
An ex-ACT3 user
Follow Ups:
Thanks ... I have heard good things about the B&K equipment. What were the main reasons for your switch? (upgradability, flexibility ...???) An important peripheral aspect for me is the ability of the processor to have a solid 2 channel presentation with augmentation of unobtrusive, realistic DSP surround / ambience. I do listen to a signficant amount of music in addition to HT. I have had a Yamaha RXV-2092 for a couple of years. I think the DSP surround implementation is pretty good. Would like better, but not worse.Any comments are appreciated.
Main reason is its price point vs performance as well as upgradeability/customer service. You may spend lots more on brand name like Krell or Lexicon MC1 but you may or may not gain a whole alot. B&K Ref30 is a no-frill pre/pro with all the realistic latest surround formats and true 'direct' from two channel to 5.1 channel in coupling with incredible sound whether it's 2 channel or THX-EX. If music is important to you and you want a unit that can deliver both: price and performance. You cannot go wrong with it. This is by far the best pre/pro that has occupied in my home. BTW, my previous prepros were ACT3 and Denon AVP8000. Denon was a much better unit than ACT3 but a bit less refined than Ref30 and it doesn't have DTS. My chief complaints with the ACT-3 were mainly the loud hiss noise and its poor bass management control in the early version.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: