|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Is monster cable worth it? posted by Estes on April 16, 2001 at 11:18:25:
in my opinion and many others monster cable is a rip-off. there are much better cables out there. monster has poor shielding and poor connection. they've taken a low quality cable, put an expensive looking connector on it, and jacked up the price. you would be much better off investing in nautilus or tributary cables. they are a little more but have triple shielding and amazing connectors. they are definitely worth the price. but second, if you are only using short cable runs (up to about 5 feet) the difference between cables will be so minute it won't be worth investing in good cables. However, a good cable can also add to the life of your component. a cheap cable leaves the terminals exposed and leaves them open for oxidation. you definitely want to purchase a cable that covers the entire terminal and fits snug. it should also be at least gold-plated. this prevents rusting which could destroy your component. i've found that expensive isn't always better. i've totally outfitted my home-theater with RCA high performance cables for about $100. it would cost about $500 for monster and there is minimal difference between the two.
Follow Ups:
I was referring to the entry level Monster Cables which are OK in terms of build quality and are around the $20 to $50 range. I would agree that paying more than that is not worth it. Also there are indeed lots of other cables on the market. I have both Tributaries and Monster in my system and while I perfer the first, I got the Monster Cable for less than $20 Canadian! That is a deal no matter how you slice it. Regardless, it is better than the junk that comes in the box with most DVD players.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: