In Reply to: did you tear up over ... posted by Mart on April 27, 2000 at 01:43:04:
hi Mart,
1) the evidence on damage by second hand smoke grows. For most,
when the link between damage to fetal development and smoking (even secondhand) became well established, the argument was over. Unless you are asserting you have a right to cause harm to other people?
2) Maine taxes Twinkies. It started a mini tax revolt, and it is going away.
3) The publicly stated purpose of the Traffic Safety people is... safety! There has been a steady decrease in fatalities largely thanks to their efforts. On their behalf, let me say you're welcome.
4) The use of the word 'proof' is improper. There is a growing body of evidence linking second hand smoke to health risks. Among scientists this is almost to the stage i like to refer to as: 'controversial as mud'.
5) Thank you for the insult, it's nice to know where you stand.
6) Drug policy in this country is a disaster. Another legacy of RMN. There is an impressive body of work on the subject, from economic analyses, to polemics. Let me refer you to "Ain't nobody's business if you do: The absurdity of consensual crimes in a free society" by Peter McWilliams. I have no intention of even synopsing
the dozens of papers, and books, i have read on the subject; but that
is a remarkable book.
7) You have probably never listened to Dr Koop speak of what he did, why, and how he did it as Surgeon General. Not only does it make a good story; but my respect for the man became enormous. He did
this country a great service. You know how a penny doubled every day
becames a million? Substitute dead bodies for pennies, and you have a good start on what epidemiology is about, and why hundreds of thousands of Americans owe their lives to him.
8) you are better than this, Mart.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- common sense - late 13:57:07 04/27/00 (9)
- this'll probably burst your bubble - Mart 16:41:27 04/27/00 (8)
- the response - late 18:06:11 04/27/00 (7)
- Re: the response - Mart 21:51:38 04/27/00 (2)
- Re: the response - late 07:07:24 04/28/00 (0)
- Re: the response - Victor Khomenko 05:10:26 04/28/00 (0)
- Re: the response - Victor Khomenko 18:35:19 04/27/00 (3)
- friend? - late 18:54:19 04/27/00 (2)
- Re: "but most of the country is glad" - Mart 20:55:29 04/27/00 (0)
- Re: friend? - Victor Khomenko 19:38:42 04/27/00 (0)