In Reply to: Re: DVD with 16:9 capable, purchase only,who cares,never? posted by John_N on July 2, 2001 at 19:52:25:
...is that many of those films, made for very wide screen, don't show well on small screen. You hardly get the intended effect of the 2.78:1 original format that was supposed to envelop you, draw you in, on your TV, even a 16:9 one. You in effect watch it from great distance, reducing the effect many-fold. In some of those cases close-ups and pan-and-scans actually do make sense. Watching something like Ben Hur when you can't even see the faces while capturing the whole panorama is not the best possible way, in my view. Of course it is always a matter of degree.As always, this is a tradeoff, with no single right answer. I think it makes sense to be flexible in these matters.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- One problem with "original" format... - Victor Khomenko 20:08:58 07/02/01 (3)
- I don't like 2.78:1 even in the theatre! - clarkjohnsen 11:15:41 07/03/01 (0)
- solution: sit closer n/a - Elizabeth 09:07:19 07/03/01 (1)
- Re: solution: sit closer n/a - Victor Khomenko 09:16:19 07/03/01 (0)