In Reply to: response (includes spoilers) posted by tunenut on July 11, 2001 at 13:08:29:
yeah that part was lame. With relatively modest suspensions of disbelief the movie is plausible till they start spouting that kind of voodoo mumbo jumbo.Could have made a more plausible scene if they dropped the DNA aspect, forgot the hair, and went for "vibrations encased in inanimate objects" angle which is plausible at least from what they have learned about stones.
Then mix in a little holographic trickery ala Superman's ability to "see" the past via distant photons, and bingo! a far more acceptable premise than the lala crap they tried to feed us.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: response (includes spoilers) - Randy Bey 22:45:12 07/11/01 (2)
- a further explanation - tunenut 14:36:56 07/12/01 (0)
- I guess you liked the ending as is - tunenut 00:35:39 07/12/01 (0)