In Reply to: Criterion to release "Deep Throat" posted by Victor Khomenko on August 13, 2001 at 05:45:20:
>>> "Anyway, all this has little to do with fine movies (but neither do the dinosaur films... really...) so feel free to shot it down." <<<Okay Victor, if you insist, I'll take a shot: Your knocking the Jurassic Park films is a subjective opinion and you're certainly entitled to it. However, some of us may love the dinosaur films and not enjoy those low budget snoozers which pass for intellectually stimulating film entertainment (i.e., I occasionally describe these movies, unjustly or not, as "art house films" regardless of how wide an audience they manage to reach). Note: What I'm REALLY refering to aren't high quality low budget personal films, but rather critically acclaimed cinema which certain Grey Poupon critics like that turns out to be "plotless wonders" (i.e., stream of consciousness films) and the so-called "chic-flicks" which are little more than Harlequin romances transferred to raw film stock.
Furthermore, ballroom dancing such as the Samba (i.e., I prefer to call it the Somnambulist), etc., is REAL boring old fart stuff! Sheeeesh, I'd rather be entertained watching kinescopes of the Lawrence Welk Show; if there is a hell, THAT would be it! BTW, people who like this tired sh*t already have their eye on a park bench and checkers in my humblist of humble opinions.
Of course, this is just my vigorous viewpoint; YM (using a walker) MV.
Rock on!
AuPh ;o)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Is that the director's cut and is it widescreen or the pan & scan version? ;^) - Audiophilander 12:57:53 08/13/01 (2)
- Re: Is that the director's cut and is it widescreen or the pan & scan version? ;^) - Rich 14:39:21 08/13/01 (1)
- You say that "Art doesn't require plot," but... - Audiophilander 13:21:05 08/14/01 (0)