In Reply to: Re: yup posted by Randy Bey on September 18, 2001 at 04:42:23:
what do you mean by your last three sentences? From a logical
viewpoint, the last statement seems inconsistent with the first
two, i.e.,in the first statement, one is distinctly visible; in the second, one
is vaguely visible, thus, in the third, wouldn't it follow that one would
be invisible, but still present (not absent)? Or is this a case of a
progressively reduced existence of an entity called "I",
presumed to be you, and not one of just visibility? Please enlighten me as I'm admittedly
unaware of the original context of these statements. - AH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I Hate To Sound Naive, But.... - AudioHead 10:16:34 09/18/01 (2)
- Re: I Hate To Sound Naive, But.... - Randy Bey 15:19:18 09/18/01 (1)
- OK <Nt> - AudioHead 15:28:52 09/18/01 (0)