In Reply to: A bit touchy, aren't we? posted by Audiophilander on January 2, 2002 at 15:45:58:
I am not gonna worry about your bigotry nonsense, that is purely Outside stuff.***How was it flawed? The subjective comment I made about Solaris being dull was honest and straightforward.
I didn't have any problem with that "subjective" part. Your fault came later.
***Also, the "reason" I provided was logical and observable, not "shallow", for anyone who finds themselves watching this snoozer.And I showed to you that that "reason" had nothing to do with art appreciation. To dismiss an artwork because it has no "story progress" - as you DID - is indeed shallow.
As I said before - art has nothing to do with the story or its progress.
You attempted to criticize an artwork through some "objective" lense, and failed to make a convincing case, that's all.
What can I say - I guess the static beauty of Laocoon is not for you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- To each his own... - Victor Khomenko 16:20:21 01/02/02 (6)
- Okay, but our views on what constitutes art are very different. - Audiophilander 14:08:20 01/03/02 (5)
- Re: Okay, but our views on what constitutes art are very different. - Victor Khomenko 14:34:18 01/03/02 (4)
- Sorry about the link; I accidently posted the 1st draft with mistyped link. - Audiophilander 15:27:30 01/03/02 (3)
- Re: Sorry about the link; I accidently posted the 1st draft with mistyped link. - Victor Khomenko 19:05:04 01/03/02 (2)
- Solaris is like that 6'x10' canvis with the yellow dot ... - Audiophilander 08:20:44 01/04/02 (1)
- More like a Corot - Victor Khomenko 12:06:41 01/04/02 (0)