In Reply to: Is "Reservoir Dogs" Tarantino's best flick? posted by rnhood on April 28, 2004 at 18:11:52:
Dogs was a rough copy for what would later be his masterpiece in Pulp Fiction. Dogs was tighter but far less ambitious. Pulp Fiction has scenes which themselves beg for a movie. Pulp is a series of scenes seemingly stand alone parts which create a whole. From its creative casting to visuals, performances, and brilliant dialogue that rings true to the seady side of life while at the same time being utterly implausible it all gels and works to perfection. I frankly don't think Dogs is anywhere near as good but I understand the guys's guy appeal to the movie.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Is "Reservoir Dogs" Tarantino's best flick? - RGA 20:25:15 04/28/04 (7)
- Pulp is the best, to date, though - tinear 07:44:40 04/29/04 (6)
- Re: Pulp is the best, to date, though - RGA 21:16:25 04/29/04 (0)
- Didn't Elmore Leonard write the book "Jackie Brown" (nt) - PdL 09:37:01 04/29/04 (4)
- Before you comment on a thread, it - tinear 16:18:18 04/29/04 (2)
- Tinear, the only obvious thing I derive from your post is your arrogance - PdL 16:47:04 04/29/04 (1)
- Well, then it hasn't been a total waste! nt - tinear 17:30:45 04/29/04 (0)
- Yes- it's called Rum Punch - Troy 12:36:56 04/29/04 (0)