I went anyway. What a god awful stupid movie. So sadly segmented. Couldn't make up it's mind what kind of movie it wanted to be stylistically or in content. Bad poker, bad acting, and no logic to speak of what so ever. Garbage wins again at the box office. My bad for going.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Finally saw Casino Royale. I knew better but - Analog Scott 16:45:15 12/09/06 (15)
- Re: Finally saw Casino Royale. I knew better but - RGA 01:57:45 12/11/06 (8)
- Best Bond film does set a low bar - Analog Scott 10:31:02 12/11/06 (7)
- Re: Best Bond film does set a low bar - RGA 01:32:28 12/12/06 (6)
- Plus, not to lose sight of the admirable fact that it conforms to the Ian Fleming original text. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:45:09 12/14/06 (1)
- It does? - Analog Scott 22:09:21 12/14/06 (0)
- Re: Best Bond film does set a low bar - Analog Scott 08:05:03 12/12/06 (3)
- Re: Best Bond film does set a low bar - RGA 05:25:27 12/13/06 (2)
- A list is what you want? OK. But B.O. ios hardly a measure of artistic merit - Analog Scott 11:36:40 12/13/06 (1)
- Re: A list is what you want? OK. But B.O. ios hardly a measure of artistic merit - RGA 00:32:55 12/16/06 (0)
- As much as you hate it, it's still the best. * - mr grits 15:42:10 12/10/06 (1)
- Best what? nt - Analog Scott 19:04:20 12/10/06 (0)
- And with the stroke of a keyboard key, you once again are - tinear 14:54:40 12/10/06 (0)
- They picked the wrong actor!!! Should have bene the guy from - Duilawyer 08:27:16 12/10/06 (2)
- You generally want your Bond to have some hair. What will the ladies run their fingers through?nt - jamesgarvin 15:24:23 12/10/06 (1)
- VERY good point!! :-) nt - Duilawyer 21:40:10 12/10/06 (0)