appreciated it a lot more. Truly, a classic. The dream sequence alone is brilliant.
Now, to the quibbles and why I don't think it's in the "greatest film" category:
Bergman's introduction of characters is unbelievable and absolutely contrary to convention. The accidental meeting with the young girl and her two suitors is but one example: give them all a ride so spontaneously? Invite them along for lodging and attending his award ceremony? Now, once the artificial intrusions were effected, the dialogue and situations were memorable.
It seems like a quibble but it occurs so much, and is so forced, as to lessen the impact and remind the viewer quite abruptly and several times, that he is watching brilliant artifice.
I suppose one could see this as unimportant and accept it as an old man's dreaming but that isn't what Bergman even hints at: the dream sequences and flashbacks clearly are so.
Still, for its depiction of the different stages of a man's life, this film is unsurpassed. The humanity seems quite startling, especially in these days of bland filmmakers, afraid of making any kind of philosophical argument, excepting nihilism.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Saw "Wild Strawberries" again and yes, I - tinear 16:03:25 03/09/07 (3)
- one of my own favorites - tunenut 19:03:57 03/09/07 (0)
- "an old man's dreaming" - dave c 16:46:51 03/09/07 (1)
- She actually turns me waaaaaaay off. Winona, Penelope, Uma, or... - tinear 14:32:28 03/10/07 (0)